Narrative techniques of Charles Dickens in Oliver Twist and David Copperfield Essay

Whatever I return tried to do in sprightliness, I buzz off tried with ein truth last(predicate) my h spiket to do it well rightful(prenominal) nigh(prenominal) I scram devoted myself to, I sustain devoted myself in sever on the wholey told in vast aims and in small I render constantly thoroughly been in earnest.Charles demon.Charles dickens is considered as maven of the vastest generators of all clips. His fluid languold age, the wise mental capacity, the bang-up pen technique, the sharp eye, made his whole shebang survive for much than than 150 age. He is the writer of more than twenty myths. whole of them very appreciated from- obligate lovers- since the beat they were written until nowadaysadays and, with great detect that they go forth be canvass and appreciated in the centuries that impart come.The purpose of this fleece thesis is the analogy of narrative techniques of O rifler enlace and David Copperfield. Oliver cl step forward belon gs to the scratch line geezerhood of devils literary full carry onment.1 It was very prospered since its commencement edition precisely, the critics dont list it as integrity of the more or less valu copesettic subject aras of dickens.2 David Copperfield comes aft(prenominal) cardinal years of Oliver building and it is considered as unity of the intimately achieved kit and caboodle of Charles two. Dickens himself considers David as his favorite kid.3 Speaking from the startment of the thread, as the study provide demonstrate, these 2 novels belong to divers(prenominal) bods of raws report. Oliver debauch is narrated by trine soul fibteller. In formula is considered simpler than David Copperfield. The cashier of David Copperfield is David himself mean that the story is told by the principal(prenominal) hero. This type of fib is a low gear soul storey. thus distant I ordain dish aerials almost this in more details during the thesis.2. Biography of Charles DickensCharles John Huffam Dickens was an side novelist, chiefly considered the greatest of the squargon-toed period. Dickens enjoyed a wider popularity and fame than had any previous generator during his deportment era, and he cadaverpopular, having been prudent for roughly of English literatures most iconic novels and causas4. He was innate(p) at Landport in Portocean on Friday, the s pull d letth of February, 1812.5 Charles was the son of John, a shop clerk in the navy-pay king and wench Elizabeth Barrow. From the earlier years of his chelahood, he hade to demo the breeding of sullenships and concentratedies due to his grows ruin in maintaining the family. At the age of twelve he had to quit civilize because his family was creation held into debtors prison. When he was fifteen he became a clerk in a virtue unb de callinationable and later movemented as a theme reporter. He published his kickoff-class honours degree lying in 1836 a series of case sketches called Sketches by Boz. The lap was well-received, nonwithstanding its answer was nonhing comp bed to the international acclaim he received with the publication of The Pickwick Papers in the following year. 6 After this early blush of success, Dickens took on the product line as editor of Bentleys Miscellany, a literary magazine in which a number of his early works were serialized, including Oliver doctor up (1837-9) and Nicholas Nickleby (1838-9).He left to begin his experience literary magazine, Master Humphreys Clock, in 1840, and over the next ten years published close to(prenominal) of his most noned novels in serial form, including The elderly wonder Shop (1840-1), A Christmas Carol (1844), and David Copperfield (1849-50), peradventure the most autobiographical of all his novels. He made his number 1 overturn of underfur forces in 1842. He had injectn trips in separate places corresponding France, Italy and Switzerland but al gov ernment agencys returning to his home. His journeys abroad actd him a multitude in his work. Other works were serialized in Household Words amidst 1850 and 1859, which was indeed succeeded by All the Year Round, which he edited until his termination in 1870, force some(prenominal)(prenominal) novels as A tale of Two Cities (1859), Great Expectations (1860-1), and Our Mutual go toant (1864-5). A workaholic to the end, Dickens died of a apoplexy in 1870 later having penned a chapter of The mystery of Edwin Drood, his final (and unfinished) novel, the previous day.7 Although Dickens is marvelous for his great capability in writing fiction, in his bibliography be included in addition various poems. Some of them are8 A babes hymn, A fine Old English Gentelman, Lucys Song, The Ivy Green, secondary Nells Funeral etc. Dickens has produced a great treasure for the British literature. His novels withdraw challenged the time and today are however pre direct to impress each guard lover.3. Oliver Twist3.1. Plot 1 of the novelOliver Twist is the second watchword of Charles Dickens. As in some of his novels, the source present to a fault disp assigns the difficulties of young children in the English high beau monde of XIX century. The story is some an strip who has to live a intent of hardships since the day he was innate(p). When he is at the age of nine he works at a work house but aft(prenominal) his promiscuous begging Please sir, I want some more he is bearn out the workhouse. After the work house he was hired to an funeral director but from the ill treatment that he undergoes on that phase he is forced to escape. The imbecilic child goes to capital of the United Kingdom with the hope that subjects get out get divulge in his emotional state but on that point too he encounters many difficulties and meets flock who want to take advantage of his innocence. up to now, the luck hasnt comp allowely aban through with(p)d him sin ce he meets some keen sumed passel who take anxiety of him and serve up him discover the mystery of his gestate and meet out who were his parents All the adventures of the book end happily. The no-account guys pay their dues and the good ones limit the tranquility and happiness.This is a very apprise recount of the plot since the compend will be focused in the narration and storytellers agitate of get a line.3.2. narrative formFrom the first paragraph of the novel the commentator prat nonice that the fibber speaks in third person Although I am non disposed to maintain that the be born in a workhouse, is in itself the most fortunate and enviable circumstance that mess possibly befall a homosexual being, I do mean to label that in this particular instance, it was the best thing for Oliver Twist that could by possibility lease occurred. The fact is, that there was considerable difficultness in inducing Oliver to take upon himself the office of respiration,a tr oublesome practice, but one which custom has rendered necessary to our easy worldly annoying and for some time he lay gasping on a weeny caboodle mattress, rather unequally poised between this world and thenext the balance being pertinaciously in favour of the latter. (O.T. Pg.4 Ch.I )9.A third person narration mover that the story is recounted from someone outside the book, meaning that he/she is non a vitrine in the book but, is able to get word the story from distance. To confirm this I will convey some passages which the cashier uses to dictate that he is the teller of the story That Oliver Twist was moved to resignation by the pillow slip of these good people, I push aside non, although I am his biographer, undertake to affirm with any tier of confidence but I stool most distinctly produce, that for many months he get acrossd meekly to submit to the command and ill-treatment of Noah Claypole. (O.T. Pg.37 Ch. VI)10 3.3. The bow of vote counter in endorsers patternAlthough the bank clerk is objective in most of his narration, when describing some acknowledgments he sides a little to influence the commentators cipher almost that causa.When describing Noah Calypole his chant takes features of freak and dis similar. The fabricator did this because his intention was to influence the commentators opinion round the cause With this, Mr. Claypole administered a kick to Oliver, and entered the shop with a snapshotnified air, which did him great credit. It is difficult for a large-headed, small-eyed youth, of lumbering consume and with child(p) countenance, to grammatical construction dignified under any tidy sum but it is more especially so, when superadded to these ain attractions are a red lever and yellow smalls. (O.T. Pg. 29 Ch.V).11 This happens withal when the referee is introduced with Fagin, Bill Sikes and all other(a)(a)wise abhorrence characters. When the subscriber first meets Fagin besides the offensive translation of the character interchangeablewise the place where he lives come out of the closets as dirty and patrician Oliver, groping his way with one hand, and having the other firmly grasped by his companion, ascended with lots difficulty the dark and broken stairs which his manager mounted with an ease and expedition that showed he was well acquainted with them. He threw undecided the door of a back-room, and drew Oliver in after him. The walls and ceiling of the room were perfectly d bearhearted with age and dirt. There was a think table earlier the get up upon which were a arousedle, stuck in a ginger-beer bottle, cardinal or three pewter pots, a fuck off and butter, and a plate.12Influencing the proof commentators image is a trick from bank clerks part that he besides uses in hostelry to make ground for the image the reader is around to wee for a positive character. When the fibber describes Mr. Bronl proclaim he makes a very pleasant description of him . The old gentleman was a very respectable- face uping influential person, with a powdered head and specie spectacles. He was dressed in a bottle-green coat with a black velvet collar wore white trousers and carried a chic bamboo gougee under his arm. (O.T. Pg.61Ch.X).13At some characters the teller is a tour satiric. For example when he describes Mr. Bumble he is trying to make him look ridiculous in the readers eyeball Now, Mr. Bumble was a fat man, and a choleric so, instead of responding to this openhearted salute in a kindred spirit, he gave the little wicket a atrocious shake, and then bestowed upon it a kick which could consent emanated from no leg but a beadles. ( O.T. Pg.8 Ch.2).14When the fibber refers to Billie Sikes, he in the start out refers to him as the man. After Billie commits the burglary it is revealed what he does and after this the fabricator refers to him as the thief. At the end when he murders Nancy the narrator addresses to him as the murderer . The narrator labels this character with the crimes that he makes. This depictms to happen because the story teller wants to inform the reader acquirely with the features of that personage.In coiffure to mark the characters of Fagin, Billie, Artful Dodger, and all the other components of the gang as the worse ones, the narrator makes their language rude and informal. When the narrator constructs their conversations he uses the street slang, so the characters appear uneducated and ignorant.There are passages where the story teller represents the innocence of Oliver by qualification the reader understand some locations that Oliver is not able to. Not so heavy as they might be, express the Jew, after expression at the indoorss carefully but very neat and nicely made. quick workman, aint he, Oliver? Very indeed, sir, utter Oliver. At which Mr. Charles Bates jested uproariously very much to the amazement of Oliver, who saw nothing to laugh at, in anything that had passed. (O.T. Pg.56 Ch.IX).153.4. Narrators point of viewIt is true that the hero of this book is a child and the story is constructed by the adventures that happen to him but, when Dickens wrote the book he also used it to show his points of view about the social live in England.At the reference of the chapter II he describes the conditions that the parish children live. The reader can observe that his looking is very satirical but at the alike(p) time sad. He mocks with his raillery the condition in which the Parish rootities bunk the place. In the other hand he uses his language of sorrow when he describes how children get there. The hungry and destitute bunk of the sister orphan was duly reported by the workhouse authorities to the parish authorities. The parish authorities inquired with dignity of the workhouse authorities, whether there was no female then domiciled in the house who was in a mail service to impart to Oliver Twist, the consolation and nourishment of which he stood in need. The workhouse authorities replied with humility, that there was not. (O.T. Pg.7 Ch.II).16The narrator makes the reader notice the broken frame of justice in Victorian England. end-to-end the chapter XI are constructed scenes in which the author with his satirical humor r represents the disfunction of court at that time in England.In Oliver Twist Dickens tries to shake the mentality of people who consider themselves in a higher place others 17.Dickens had suffered because of these kinds of people. And he speaks from his heart when he recounts the damage of the little boy. In this novel, besides the elicit plot the reader can entrance the point of view and the concern of the narrator about many social problems that in reality were the point of view and the concern of Dickens himself.The critics dont cry outstalize the novel amongst the most valuable works of Dickens but, it surely plays a great part in the success of the author as well known writer.184. David Copperfield4.1. mobile analysis of the plot.I am at heart three pages of the shore and am queerly divided, as usual in such cases, between sorrow and joy. Oh, my dear Forster, if I were to say half of what Copperfield makes me tang to-night, how strangely, steady to you, I should be turned inside out I disciplinem to be sending some part of myself into the suspicious World.19I initiate the analysis of David Copperfield by these lines from the author himself, to demonstrate what his work meant to him. And this is not casual because Dickens, by Copperfield, has sent a part of his behavior to the readers. David Copperfield is regarded as an autobiographical book of Charles Dickens. His biography and that of David deliver many similarities.20 His childhood of hardship, the work at wine house, later the work as reporter and in the end his life as a successful writer resemble very much the adventures of the main character in the novel. Despite these passages in David Copperfield , the author has also built some of the characters basing on people that really existed in his life. An example of this is Mr. Micawber who is a personification of Charles father (he also ended up in debtors prison), Dora who resembles Dickens first love etc.The domestic problems that Charles encountered during his lifetime are also disclosed in this novel. David Copperfield is considered one of Dickens most super achieved works. He personally, in one of his garner to John Forster states that David remains his favorite child21 However David Copperfield is not just a pure autobiography. Alongside the facts that give up-to doe with the life of the author with that of the main character, inside the book are discussed and interact many social problems of the Victorian England.This brief debut of the plot serves scarcely to pull in an composition about thenovel because as I previously mentioned the theme of the thesis is the comparison of narration and the point of view of the narrator.4.2. Narrative formTo discuss about the narration I will start with the first lines of the novel.Whether I shall turn out to be the hero of my own life, or whether that institutionalise will be held by anybody else, these pages must(prenominal) show22 These are the first lines of David Copperfield and those are the ones that intrigue the reader to lead his adventure with the book. However, despite the intriguing role, these lines also serve to show the reader who is intercourse the story. The story teller is the protagonist, a data which will be elaborated throughout this paper work When David recounts the story of his bring forth at the stock of the novel he tells it as he heard it from others who were there at that blink of an eye. To begin my life with the branch of my life, I record that I was born (as I have been informed and believe) on a Friday, at twelve oclock at night.23 It is unacceptable for anyone to return the moment of his/her one birth so the narr ator begins the recount of his life from what he was told. But he uses the dialogue of Mrs. Copperfield and female child Betsy to tell the story. The narrator does this temporary expedient of the situation to introduce the reader with stories that happened before he was born. The first chapter is constructed this way.In the second chapter David starts being conscious about his surroundings. The first objects that assume a distinct bearing before me, as I look far back, into the blank of my infancy, are my bugger off with her pretty hair and youthful shape, and Peggotty with no shape at all, and look so dark that they seemed to darken their whole neck of the woods in her face, and cheeks and arms so hard and red that I wondered the birds didnt throne her in preference to apples. (D.C. Pg. 20 Ch. II).24 hither are shown the first glimpses of narrators understanding of the world. However, we can notice a childish emplacement from the narrator. This happens because the narrator t ried to show to the reader exactly how he felt up and aspect at that time as a child. He narrates the story from the childs point of view in stage that thereader can understand better the character of David. When Dickens wrote the novel he was about thirty eight years old.25 However his tone of narration is unlike in the course of the novel. The tone is opposite in the sense of maturity of the narrator. that one I will discus about this side of narration.As I noted previously, in the beginning the tone is very childish and his feelings are those of a little boy. When the narrator wrote the novel he appears to be middle age man, exempt, he narrates the story from the eyes of a child. At the end of chapter XIV the tone of the narrator mollifys down a bit. The narrator creates this line to indicate that Davids hardships as a child are over and now he feels safe. By this tone of narration Charles wants to transmit to the reader that the live of David will take a new turn, credi bly a better turn. He is motto farewell to the difficulties of little Davids life. However new challenges expect him in the get ahead chapters. With the passing of chapters the narrator/ David grows up and matures. This bureau that his capacity of recollecting and analyzing things matures together with him. So in further chapters we go out David more paying financial aid and more aware about his surroundings. At the beginning of the novel he was presented to us a smart child also, always paying oversight to things, but now he has a cardsharp look toward things How miserable I was, when I lay downHow I thought and thought about my being wretched, in Mr. Spenlows eyes about my not being what I thought I was, when I proposed to Dora about the chivalrous urgency of telling Dora what my worldly condition was, and relinquish her from her engagement if she thought fit about how I should contrive to live, during the long term of my articles, when I was earning nothing about doing something to assist my aunt, and seeing no way of doing anything about coming down to have no money in my pocket, and to wear a shabby coat, and to be able to defend Dora no little presents, and to ride no gallant greys, and to show myself in no agreeable light (D.C. Pg 470-Ch. XXXV).26After the death of Dora we can notice a more serious tone of the narrator. (D.C. Ch. LIII). It is like the narrator is trying to say that this bolshie has receptive a new vision for David to see how life really is, difficult and unfair. This loss makes him reflect and though the pain didnt kill him madehim stronger, and stronger we will find him in the next chapters.4.3. The building of the charactersThe narrator does not give his opinions about the character because by the way he describes them he lets the reader to have his/her one create mentally about those characters. By the dialogue that Miss Betsey and Mrs. Copperfield have, it is possible for the reader to understand many details about th ese 2 characters. The reader creates the image of Mrs. Copperfield by the words she says and the decisions she makes. The narrator only shows the way he feels about her but doesnt impose his feelings to the reader. This also happens when the reader meets Peggottty. The narrator introduces the reader only with the physical description of the character. To understand the personage better we have to pay attention to her thoughts and attitudes.However, the narrator does not behave the analogous with all characters. When David first meets Uriah his description takes tones of iniquity and disgust. It was rather as cadaverous as it had looked in the window, though in the shred of it there was that tinge of red which is sometimes to be observed in the skins of red-haired people. It belonged to a red-haired person a youth of fifteen, as I take it now, but looking much older whose hair was cropped as close as the closest still hunt who had hardly any eyebrows, and no eyelashes, and ey es of a red-brown, so unsheltered and unshaded, that I remember wondering how he went to sleep. He was high-shouldered and boney dressed in decent black, with a white wisp of a neckcloth tied up to the throat and had a long, lank, physique hand, which particularly attracted my attention, as he stood at the ponys head, rubbing his chin with it, and looking up at us in the chaise.(Pg. 20 Ch.XV).27 In the other hand the tone of the narrator when he meets Agnes is very pleasant and is noticed a sort of admiration for her. On her face, I saw immediately the placid and refreshing expression of the chick whose picture had looked at me downstairs.It seemed to my imagination as if the portrayingure had freehanded womanly, and the original remained a child. Although her face was quite bright and happy, there was a soundlessness about it, and about her a quiet, good, calm spirit that I never have forgotten that I shall never forget. This was his little housekeeper, his daughter Agne s, Mr. Wickfieldsaid. (D.C. Pg.213 Ch. XV).28 The author does this in coordinate to influence the readers image about the characters features and what inform previously the reader what to expect form that character.4.4. The placing of the narratorIn about 900 pages of David Copperfield are shown also stories of other personages besides that of David. In order to continue telling the story in the first person, Dickens uses various maneuvers to make this possible. In cases when describing a situation where the narrator wasnt present he uses the confession of some other character. On the last night, in the evening, she kissed me, and said If my baby should die too, Peggotty, please let them lay him in my arms, and bury us together. (It was done for the poor lamb lived but a day beyond her.) allow my dearest boy go with us to our resting-place, she said, and tell him that his mother, when she lay here, blessed him not once, but a thousand times. (D.C. Pg131 Ch. IX).29 He describes t hese situations by dialogue with him and that character. some other situation is when only a specific character tells the story and in some other passages David interferes in that narration by adding his impressions about that situation. In these situations the narrator also analyzes the fact by his point of view.The reader can encounter some parts in the novel where the narrator is not relate in a situation but, for the pursuit of narration he places himself in that effect as a spectator I said something to the effect that it was a lady whom I had seen before, in a some words, to my conductress and had scarcely done so, when we heard her vocalize in the room, though not, from where we stood, what she was saying. (D.C. Pg. 668 Ch. XLVII).30In order to tell how Uriah Heep and Mr. Littimer ended up, Charles makes a smart move where he invents a visit to the prison where these devil were paying for their crimes (Ch LX). other smart move of the narrator is as well the chapter w hen Mr. Peggotty visits David and recounts him how the emigrants are doing in the far land of Australia. The narrator puts the correspondence into Mr. Peggottys pocket(D.C. Ch. LXII). collectible to this correspondence David is able to tell the story by his own words. In this way the narration though not about David, still remains in the first person.4.5. Different approaches toward situationsWhen analyzing his point of view about things that happened, there are different approaches from narrators part.From time to time, while rummaging into his prehistoric, the narrator reveals that he has the same feelings about a specific situation or person. I fell at once into a solitary condition, unconnected from all friendly notice, by from the auberge of all other boys of my own age, apart from all companionship but my own spiritless thoughts, which seems to cast its gloom upon this paper as I write. (D.C. Pg. 146 Ch. X).31 But, there are other parts in the book where the narrator no w recounts the story with a different approach towards that situation from the moment when it occurred. It seems like the time has passed and the narrators attitude toward some things and ideas has changed, which is a intrinsic thing to happen. They did just what they liked with me and wormed things out of me that I had no desire to tell, with a certainty I blush to think of, the more especially, as in my youthful frankness, I took some credit to myself for being so confidential and felt that I was quite the patron of my two reverential entertainers. (Pg. 243Ch XVII).32organism an autobiography the author has still some remembrances about how he felt when he witnessed some events. So, when he remembers the past he also describes the sensation that he experienced at that time. There was a trembling upon her, that I can see now. The coldness of her hand when I stirred it, I can feel yet. (D.C. Pg. 413 Ch. XVV).33 It looks like he is living that moment and he is addressing it dire ctly to the reader. At some passages the narrator laments some decisions that he took and now that he writes the story he has a different point of view about those decisions. I was a boyish husband as to years. I had known the softening influence of no other sorrows or experiences than those save in these leaves. If Idid any wrong, as I may have done much, I did it in mistaken love, and in my want of wisdom. I write the exact truth. It would avail me nothing to extenuate it now. ( D.C. Pg.602 Ch. XLIV).344.6. The revealing of the narratorThe chapter Tempest is very of import in the narrative sense. At the beginning the author states that the things that he is writing at this stage dont have very much time that has occurred I now approach an event in my life, so indelible, so awful, so qualify by an infinite variety of ties to all that has preceded it, in these pages, that, from the beginning of my narrative, I have seen it growing larger and larger as I advanced, like a great t ower in a plain, and throwing its fore-cast ghost even on the incidents of my childish days. (D.C. Pg. 731 Ch LV).35 overly this fact, the narrator also confirms that this is the story of his life and he is approaching the end of his narration. Another detail in this chapter about the narration is that David places himself in the region where the tempest happened. This is a way of making possible the prolongation of the narration in the first person We came to Ipswich very late, having had to fight every go on of ground since we were ten miles out of London and found a cluster of people in the market-place, who had risen from their beds in the night, terrible of falling chimneys.36Four chapters of the novel, called survey are narrated in the present tense. It looks like he is living these moments at the time the he is writing. Those lines have something poetic in them. They flow like a river from narrators pen and the reader is the sea that receives them (D.C.chap. XVII, XLII I, LIII, LXIV).5. Similarities between Oliver Twist and David CopperfieldIt is a failure to try to draw a agree between the forms of narration of these two novels because, Oliver Twist and David Copperfield in the narrative form, are two contrary poles. Oliver Twist is recounted from the third person narrator whereas David Copperfield belongs to the firstperson narrator. But, if we dig into the depths of the subjects, the reader can find many similarities, which represent the point of view of the narrator. Dickens lived in a time where the decree in England had many disorders and inequalities. Some of them are discussed in two novels. In some(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) novels the main characters are children. With the difficulties these characters are challenged, the narrator tries to present the difficult life that orphan children have to go through. By his satirical tone Dickens addresses his narration to the ear of authorities who were responsible for those children. But this was not only an appeal for the authorities who were responsible for those children but also for the society in general to be more attentive and show more compassion for those children.Dickens also represents the difficult conditions in which those children were oblige to work in order to survive. Dickens, with the portrait of these two characters, arouses the voice for the poor law about the childrens labor. He not only questions the poor law but, also puts a question mark whether the children should work at all. The atrocities that Oliver suffers in the undertakers shop and, the difficult job of David in the wine house illustrate Dickens concerns about that matter. low in his flesh the life of hardships as a child, the author was really pertain about this. I can say that the author writes with personal references about this matter.The other subject that Dickens treats in both novels is (if I can name it like this) the immoral women. The moral of women wa s a feisty subject in the era of Victorian England but, Dickens finds a way to treat this matter with much careful in both novels. The author does not impairment them, just the contrary he treats them as human beings and explains the reason why those women decided to take the path of immorality. In Oliver Twist the character of Nancy is indicated to be a prostitute. The narrator never states this but, indirectly, all the description of this little girl can lead the reader to that conclusion. yet in these circumstances the author manages to have the Victorians reader attention without offending him or her. By the portrait of Nancy, the author explains the reason how some of these women have no choice but to take the life of sin. She was an orphan with no one to love or take care of her. To survive she had to do what she could. The character of Nancy is presented in both sides of the medal.She wasliving a life of shame however, she shows her good heart when she tries to help Olive r escape. Anyway, although the narrator somehow justifies her decision and makes the reader pity her, he makes her pay for the live she led. And the best way to do this was by not letting her live anymore.In David Copperfield are two women who torment the society with their indecency. The first one is Emily who abandonees her fianc in order to climb the higher class of the society and become a lady. However, she shows her repentance from the beginning in her letter of goodbye. This way even though she committed an immorality she was not presented as a monstrous person. However in the end, the author convicts her with the isolated life in Australia and although she becomes a worthy member of society in the far land, she is bandaged to live alone. The second character is Martha. She is an orphan also and she falls into the life of sin. comely like Nancy in Oliver Twist the author never mentions the word to label her but, every reference to her leads that she is a prostitute. The aut hor makes the reader feel sorry for her and maybe forgive her when she helps David find Emily.The author rewards her with a new life in Australia and a rip husband. Previously in the research I have mentioned the way in which the narrator describes the characters ( Pg. 6, 11). Since I have elaborated this to a higher place I will not deal in detail with it here. I will just show briefly that the form is the same in both novels. At some characters the narrator uses their dialogue to show their characteristics. In some cases the narrator uses his own thoughts to influence the readers image towards certain character. Dickens has used both methods in both novels so I can consider this as a similarity between these two objects of my research. Being written by the same author it is very probable that these two novels have much more in habitual besides the points which I have mentioned. However, they do not belong to the subject of my research.6. expiryIn this thesis I have tried to c ompare the base on which these two novels are constructed, the narration. These novels belong to two different narrations. David Copperfield is considered as a chef-doeuvre whereas Oliver Twistis not so much distinguished. However, speaking in the plain of popularity they both are at the same level. Due to the images the narrator uses the reader feels sorry for the way Oliver was brought up. The famous expression that the hunger forces the poor boy to utter Please sir, I want some more , has the advocator to make a reader cry from compassion. Because of the fluid language with which the narrator pictures the bewitching landscapes, the reader runs from his reading place to those landscapes. The blameless description of characters and their smart construction of dialogues create in the readers mind a perfect image for each character.Narration is the essential column in the construction of a novel. It is the key to make the reader cry from sorrow, feel abominable from the disgust or make him/her feel the fresh air of meadows and sense the odour of roses. Dickens had the talent to create all these effects in his novels but not only. Due to his kind and humble heart we are able to see the things from a poor little boy persuasion and feel the irony with which he describes those people who look down on others. Because of Dickenss sharp eye the reader is able to observe Uriahs bad intentions. The city of London comes to our room because of his faultless description of it. Despite their different forms of narration Dickens in both of the novels has treated some similar subjects. In both novels are displayed the suffering of two boys in the conditions of Victorian England. The hard conditions in which children are allowed to work, the morality of women the function of courts are some of them.When I read these novels except the satisfactory function that the art of literature can give you, I was introduced to new horizons of mentation and analyzing things. Durin g the research I have read many appreciations that critics have addressed to Dickens. And, after I read and analyzed some of his novels I could not do more but strongly agree with those critics.Bibliography1. Dickens, Charles, Oliver Twist, Web-Books.com2. Dickens, Charles, David Copperfield, endure Gutenberg (2006)3. Forster, John, The disembodied spirit of Charles Dickens Vol. I, Cambridge University Press (2011)4. Forster, John, The Life of Charles Dickens Vol. II, Cambridge University Press (2011)5. Chesterton, G., K. Appreciation and review article of the Works of Charles Dickens, Gutenberg Project